Large Language Models Generalize SRL Prediction to New Languages Within But Not Between Domains

Main

Sidebar

Published September 8, 2025
Conrad Borchers Jiayi Zhang Hendrik Fleischer Sascha Schanze Vincent Aleven Ryan Baker

Abstract

Think-aloud protocols are a standard method to study self-regulated learning (SRL) during learning by problem-solving. Advances in automated transcription and large language models (LLMs) have automated the transcription and labeling of SRL in these protocols, reducing manual effort. However, while effective in many emerging applications, previous works show LLMs struggle with reliably classifying SRL across specific instructional domains, such as chemistry or formal logic. Can LLMs reliably classify SRL within a given domain, but also across different languages that represent distinct instructional approaches? This study investigates using classification models based on LLM embeddings to automatically detect SRL in think-aloud transcripts of 26 students at German and American universities working with three tutoring systems for chemistry and formal logic. Using OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small, we predicted four categories of SRL processes based on the four-stage SRL model by Winne and Hadwin (processing information, planning, enacting, and realizing errors). We compare how well embedding-based SRL models transfer between English and German across chemistry and logic domains, including how levels of scaffolding in the tutoring systems and culturally unfamiliar instruction impact transfer. We found that LLM embedding-based classifiers trained on English data can reliably classify SRL categories in German think-aloud data (and vice versa) with minimal performance degradation within but not between domains of instruction. Further, model transfer performance declined due to linguistic differences in subject-specific terminology and unawareness of instructional context, such as specific hint messages. Considering these factors in future refinement of our methodology will move the field closer to the research goal of a reliable SRL classifier that is domain-, language-, and learning system-general.

How to Cite

Large Language Models Generalize SRL Prediction to New Languages Within But Not Between Domains. (2025). Journal of Educational Data Mining, 17(2), 24-54. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17073680
Abstract 11 | PDF Downloads 9 HTML Downloads 0

Details

Keywords

self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, large language models, NLP, intelligent tutoring systems, instructional context, chemistry education, prediction, classification

References
Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., Avila, R., Babuschkin, I., Balaji, S., Balcom, V., Baltescu, P., Bao, H., Bavarian, M., Belgum, J., Bello, I., & Zoph, B. (2023). GPT-4 technical report (arXiv). https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

Aleven, V. (2010). Rule-based cognitive modeling for intelligent tutoring systems. In Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 33–62). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., van Velsen, M., Popescu, O., Demi, S., Ringenberg, M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Example-tracing tutors: Intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26, 1, 224–269.

Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16, 2, 101–128.

Andersland, M. (2024). Amharic LLaMA and LLaVA: Multimodal LLMs for low resource languages (arXiv Preprint). https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06354

Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., & Oboko, R. (2020). Research trends in measurement and intervention tools for self-regulated learning for e-learning environments—Systematic review (2008–2018). Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15, 1–21.

Artetxe, M., & Schwenk, H. (2019). Massively multilingual sentence embeddings for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and beyond. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7, 597–610.

Azevedo, R. (2014). Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self-and socially-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 217–228.

Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., Graesser, A., Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2011). Use of hypermedia to assess and convey self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 327–342). Routledge. New York, NY.

Azevedo, R., Taub, M., & Mudrick, N. V. (2017). Understanding and reasoning about real-time cognitive, affective, and metacognitive processes to foster self-regulation with advanced learning technologies. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 323–337). Routledge. New York, NY.

Baker, R. S. (2019). Challenges for the future of educational data mining: The Baker learning analytics prizes. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 11(1), 1–17.

Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 531-540). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 161–185.

Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J. S., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(02), 123–152.

Borchers, C., Fleischer, H., Yaron, D. J., McLaren, B. M., Scheiter, K., Aleven, V., & Schanze, S. (2025). Problem-solving strategies in stoichiometry across two intelligent tutoring systems: A cross-national study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(2), 384-400.

Borchers, C., Yang, K., Lin, J., Rummel, N., Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2024). Combining dialog acts and skill modeling: What chat interactions enhance learning rates during AI-supported peer tutoring? In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 157–168).

Borchers, C., Zhang, J., Baker, R. S., & Aleven, V. (2024). Using think-aloud data to understand relations between self-regulation cycle characteristics and student performance in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 529-539).

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.

Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291–314.

Conneau, A., Lample, G., Ranzato, M. A., Denoyer, L., & Jégou, H. (2017). Word translation without parallel data (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.04087

Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 15–30.

Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 844–875.

de Araujo, A., Papadopoulos, P. M., McKenney, S., & de Jong, T. (2023). Automated coding of student chats, a trans-topic and language approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100123.

Doddapaneni, S., Ramesh, G., Khapra, M. M., Kunchukuttan, A., & Kumar, P. (2021). A primer on pretrained multilingual language models (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00676

Dröse, J., & Prediger, S. (2018). Strategien für Textaufgaben. Fördern mit Info-Netzen und Formulierungsvariationen. Mathematik Lehren, 206, 8–12.

Dudy, S., Ahmad, I. S., Kitajima, R., & Lapedriza, A. (2024). Analyzing Cultural Representations of Emotions in LLMs through Mixed Emotion Survey (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02143

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178–186.

Firoozi, T., Mohammadi, H., & Gierl, M. J. (2024). Using automated procedures to score educational essays written in three languages. Journal of Educational Measurement, 62(1), 33–56.

Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 316.

Gonen, H., Ravfogel, S., Elazar, Y., & Goldberg, Y. (2020). It’s not Greek to mBERT: Inducing word-level translations from multilingual BERT (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08275

Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

Grawemeyer, B., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Holmes, W., Mavrikis, M., Rummel, N., Mazziotti, C., & Janning, R. (2015). Talk, tutor, explore, learn: Intelligent tutoring and exploration for robust learning. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED).

Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203–209.

Greene, J. A., Deekens, V. M., Copeland, D. Z., & Yu, S. (2017). Capturing and modeling self-regulated learning using think-aloud protocols. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 323–337). Routledge. New York, NY.

Greene, J. A., Robertson, J., & Costa, L. J. C. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using think-aloud methods. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 327–342). Routledge. New York, NY.

Hatala, M., Nazeri, S., & Kia, F. S. (2023). Progression of students’ SRL processes in subsequent programming problem-solving tasks and its association with tasks outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100881.

He, J., & Li, X. (2024). Zero-shot cross-lingual automated essay scoring. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024) (pp. 17819-17832).

Heeg, J., Hundertmark, S., & Schanze, S. (2020). The interplay between individual reflection and collaborative learning–seven essential features for designing fruitful classroom practices that develop students’ individual conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 765–788.

Heirweg, S., De Smul, M., Merchie, E., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2020). Mine the process: Investigating the cyclical nature of upper primary school students’ self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 48(4), 337–369.

Hu, J., Ruder, S., Siddhant, A., Neubig, G., Firat, O., & Johnson, M. (2020). XTREME: A massively multilingual multi-task benchmark for evaluating cross-lingual generalisation. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 4411-4421). PMLR.

Huang, K. H., Ahmad, W. U., Peng, N., & Chang, K. W. (2021). Improving zero-shot cross-lingual transfer learning via robust training (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08645

Hutt, S., DePiro, A., Wang, J., Rhodes, S., Baker, R. S., Hieb, G., Sethuraman, S., Ocumpaugh, J., & Mills, C. (2024). Feedback on feedback: Comparing classic natural language processing and generative AI to evaluate peer feedback. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 55-65).

Hutt, S., Ocumpaugh, J., Ma, J., Andres, A. L., Bosch, N., Paquette, L., Biswas, G., & Baker, R. S. (2021). Investigating SMART models of self-regulation and their impact on learning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2021), pp. 580-587.

King, E. C., Benson, M., Raysor, S., Holme, T. A., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., & Yaron, D. J. (2022). The open-response chemistry cognitive assistance tutor system: Development and implementation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 99(2), 546–552.

Kizilcec, R. F., Saltarelli, A. J., Reich, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs. Science, 355(6322), 251–252.

Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. (2010). A data repository for the EDM community: The PSLC DataShop. In Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., Baker, R.S.J.d. (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Data Mining (pp. 43–56). CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.

Koedinger, K. R., Carvalho, P. F., Liu, R., & McLaughlin, E. A. (2023). An astonishing regularity in student learning rate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(13), e2221311120.

Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Mirriahi, N., Blaine, E., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Dawson, S. (2018). Understand students’ self-reflections through learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 389-398).

Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 173–194.

Li, B., He, Y., & Xu, W. (2021). Cross-lingual named entity recognition using parallel corpus: A new approach using XLM-RoBERTa alignment (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11112

Li, C., Chen, M., Wang, J., Sitaram, S., & Xie, X. (2024). CultureLLM: Incorporating cultural differences into large language models (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10946

Lim, L., Bannert, M., van der Graaf, J., Molenaar, I., Fan, Y., Kilgour, J., Moore, J., & Gašević, D. (2021). Temporal assessment of self-regulated learning by mining students’ think-aloud protocols. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 749749.

Lin, J., Tan, W., Du, L., Buntine, W., Lang, D., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2023). Enhancing educational dialogue act classification with discourse context and sample informativeness. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 258-269.

Liu, X., Zhang, J., Barany, A., Pankiewicz, M., & Baker, R. S. (2024). Assessing the potential and limits of large language models in qualitative coding. In International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography (pp. 89–103).

McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011a). A politeness effect in learning with web-based intelligent tutors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1–2), 70–79.

McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011b). Polite web-based intelligent tutors: Can they improve learning in classrooms? Computers & Education, 56(3), 574–584.

McLaren, B. M., Lim, S. J., Gagnon, F., Yaron, D., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). Studying the effects of personalized language and worked examples in the context of a web-based intelligent tutor. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 318-328). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

McNamara, D. S., Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Dascalu, M., & Perret, C. A. (2017). Natural language processing and learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 93–104). Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR).

Merullo, J., Castricato, L., Eickhoff, C., & Pavlick, E. (2022). Linearly mapping from image to text space (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.15162

Molenaar, I., Horvers, A., & Baker, R. S. (2021). What can moment-by-moment learning curves tell about students’ self-regulated learning? Learning and Instruction, 72, 101206.

Nasiar, N., Baker, R. S., Zou, Y., Zhang, J., & Hutt, S. (2023). Modeling problem-solving strategy invention (PSSI) behavior in an online math environment. In N. Wang, G. Rebolledo-Mendez, V. Dimitrova, N. Matsuda, & O. C. Santos (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Posters and late breaking results, workshops and tutorials, industry and innovation tracks, practitioners, doctoral consortium and blue sky. AIED 2023. Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 1831, pp. 453–459). Springer, Cham.

Neelakantan, A., Xu, T., Puri, R., Radford, A., Han, J. M., Tworek, J., Yuan, Q., Tezak, N., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Heidecke, J., Shyam, P., Power, B., Eloundou Nekoul, T., Sastry, G., Krueger, G., Schnurr, D., Petroski Such, F., Hsu, K., & Weng, L. (2022). Text and code embeddings by contrastive pre-training (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10005

Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 198–215.

Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R., Gowda, S., Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2014). Population validity for educational data mining models: A case study in affect detection. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 487–501.

Omran, T. M., Sharef, B. T., Grosan, C., & Li, Y. (2023). Transfer learning and sentiment analysis of Bahraini dialects sequential text data using multilingual deep learning approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 143, 102106.

OpenAI. (n.d.). Embeddings. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/embeddings

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.

Paquette, L., & Baker, R. S. (2019). Comparing machine learning to knowledge engineering for student behavior modeling: A case study in gaming the system. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 585–597.

Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Xu, T., Brockman, G., McLeavey, C., & Sutskever, I. (2023). Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 36, pp. 28492–28518). Curran Associates, Inc.

Richey, J. E., Nguyen, H. A., Mehrvarz, M., Else-Quest, N., Arroyo, I., Baker, R. S., Stec, H., Hammer, J., & McLaren, B. M. (2024). Understanding gender effects in game-based learning: The role of self-explanation. In A. M. Olney, I.-A. Chounta, Z. Liu, O. C. Santos, & I. I. Bittencourt (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: AIED 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14829, pp. 206–219). Springer, Cham.

Saint, J., Fan, Y., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2022). Temporally-focused analytics of self-regulated learning: A systematic review of literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100060.

Saint, J., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2020). Trace-SRL: A framework for analysis of microlevel processes of self-regulated learning from trace data. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(4), 861–877.

Schmidt, H. J. (1997). An alternate path to stoichiometric problem solving. Research in Science Education, 27, 237–249.

Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(2), 166.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. Taylor & Francis.

Selting, M., Auer, P., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.

Sun, X., & Xu, W. (2014). Fast implementation of DeLong’s algorithm for comparing the areas under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 21(11), 1389–1393.

Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.

van der Graaf, J., Lim, L., Fan, Y., Kilgour, J., Moore, J., Gašević, D., Bannert, M., & Molenaar, I. (2022). The dynamics between self-regulated learning and learning outcomes: An exploratory approach and implications. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 745–771.

Wang, Z., Du, B., & Guo, Y. (2019). Domain adaptation with neural embedding matching. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 31(7), 2387–2397.

Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., Chi, E. H., Hashimoto, T., Vinyals, O., Liang, P., Dean, J., & Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models (arXiv Preprint). http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682

Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 4, 267–276.

Winne, P. H. (2017). Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 241–249). Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR).

Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. S. (2013). The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 1–8.

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 291–318). Routledge. New York, NY.

Yenduri, G., Ramalingam, M., Chemmalar Selvi, G., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Deepti Raj, G., Jhaveri, R. H., Prabadevi, B., Wang, W., Vasilakos, A. V., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2024). GPT (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer)—A comprehensive review on enabling technologies, potential applications, emerging challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access, 12, 54608–54649.

Zambrano, A. F., Zhang, J., & Baker, R. S. (2024). Investigating algorithmic bias on Bayesian knowledge tracing and carelessness detectors. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 349-359).

Zhang, J., Andres, A., Baker, R., & Cloude, E. B. (2023). Leveraging natural language processing to detect gaming the system in open-ended questions in a math digital learning game. 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse.

Zhang, J., Andres, J. M. A. L., Hutt, S., Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Nasiar, N., Mills, C., Brooks, J., Sethuraman, S., & Young, T. (2022). Using machine learning to detect SMART model cognitive operations in mathematical problem-solving process. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 14(3), 76–108.

Zhang, J., Baker, R. S., Andres, J. M., Hutt, S., & Sethuraman, S. (2023). Automated multi-dimensional analysis of peer feedback in middle school mathematics. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning-CSCL 2023 (pp. 221-224). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Zhang, J., Borchers, C., Aleven, V., & Baker, R. S. (2024). Using large language models to detect self-regulated learning in think-aloud protocols. In B. Paassen & C. D. Epp (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2024) (pp. 157–168).

Zhang, J., Borchers, C., & Barany, A. (2024). Studying the interplay of self-regulated learning cycles and scaffolding through ordered network analysis across three tutoring systems. In Y. J. Kim & Z. Swiecki (Eds.), Advances in quantitative ethnography (ICQE 2024). Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 2278, pp. 231–246). Springer, Cham.

Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 187–202.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–40). Academic Press. San Diego, CA.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)